How about just a transmitter?
Let's think about this. Many people working 160-80-40 & 20m very often receive using WEB SDRs which are extremely popular considering the huge increase in noise at most QTHs reaching S7-9 levels.
So there has to be a case to separate TX & RX not to build transceivers at all. The Ham shack would then be a PC & Internet connection, browser and web SDR plus your own transmitter which you tune to the same frequency as reception.
So what should be the spec for a transmitter only
- Audio/MIC input with EQ & compression
- digital; audio input for digital transmissions, and/or audio line input, no EQ or Comp
- Key input, straight and paddle
- SSB & CW 1.8-30MHz, probably SDR as much easier to get wide coverage, use ready made modules?
- 100W say, PA with ALC 5-100W selection, LPFs for all bands, relay switched
- a low level 0dBm output for transverter?
- Auto ATU with 50R coax, balanced and long wire outputs
- built-in power supply - SMPS for low dissipation.
- Front panel or remote operation. PTT & CAT commands
That's quite a list but it is do-able, ain't it? Got to define a way to switch TR between transmitter and reception on a PC...
All in all, it could save us a lot of money to have such a product. It might also stimulate better and more advanced web SDRs to be developed.
2 comments:
Hello Antony
Since reception is in WebSDR is it necessary to have TX / RX switching?
Gilles F1BFU
Casino Bonus Codes & Promotions - Jammyhub
The Mohegan Sun 구리 출장안마 Casino no deposit bonus 포항 출장샵 codes are 영주 출장안마 no longer available! Read our Casino Bonus Codes & Promotions 태백 출장안마 for December 2021, and claim your Mohegan Sun 평택 출장마사지
Post a Comment